Hi, all: Below is a piece that Rev. Dr. Pennybacker, who chairs KFA's Religious Advisory Committee, placed in the Herald-Leader earlier this week. Enjoy ~Jody
Foundation using religion to divide, not to embrace
By Albert M. Pennybacker
At issue: June 30 Herald-Leader article, ”Group Targets 6 on UK Faculty,“
The attack dogs are still at work among us, this time under the banner of The Family Foundation.
Many splendid comments, such as the statement by UK President Lee T. Todd Jr., have been made. But progressive religious voices have not been clearly heard, though it is a religious view that fuels this action.
I am appalled that the foundation has attacked respected professors at the very best of our Kentucky universities and sought to manipulate state funding against them.
And this action, note, is taken on the basis of the foundation's ideological agenda. Has The Family Foundation been appointed guardian of what is intellectually appropriate and morally acceptable?
Second, the foundation is an integral part of a larger network of exclusivist religion -- ”my way or the highway“ -- which is always suspect.
Why else would legitimate areas of study be attacked as offensive or inappropriate? Good religion affirms an open mind, advocates honest inquiry and applauds sound intellectual contributions to understanding the complexities in the life we share. These foster our living better together.
Third, have you noticed how preoccupied with managing our sexual identity and behavior these fundamentalist religious themes often are?
Resilient religion has always believed that human sexuality is a good and generous gift, for our joy and for our sharing in God's creation. Pinch-nosed piety has always missed the point. Most of us are very tired of having this sort of accusatory and religiously narrow voice inflicted on us.
Enough! It needs to be thoroughly repudiated. I applaud these six professors for seeking to enlarge human understanding. Many religious people concur.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Poor Form Politics in Arizona
If you want to see poor form politics in action, check out the happenings in Arizona. I have said many times my hat is off to EQ. Arizona; they are a first class operation and I'm glad it is their team organizing to defeat this.
A MESSAGE FROM EQUALITY ARIZONA:
We just got back from the state Capitol, where the Senate voted to force another constitutional amendment to define marriage on the ballot. What happened tonight was disgraceful, but that doesn't change the fact that we will be facing another anti-LGBT amendment this November. It's true. The Arizona Legislature caved to the coercion of a little-known group, the Center for Arizona Policy, led by an extremist fundamentalist -- Cathi Herrod. The Legislature ignored the people of Arizona, who already voted down a similar amendment. The Senate approved Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 1042 tonight, and they broke the rules, along with the sanctity of the Senate, to do so.
How Your Senator Voted
SCR 1042 was brought to the floor of the Senate for reconsideration tonight. It passed with the 16 votes it needed. Below is the list of how your Senator voted.
Find out who your Senator is by clicking here.
Yes
Sylvia Allen (R-5)Robert Blendu (R-12)Robert "Bob" Burns (R-9)Pamela Gorman (R-6)Ron Gould (R-3)Chuck Gray (R-19)Linda Gray (R-10)Jack W. Harper (R-4)John Huppenthal (R-20)Karen Johnson (R-18)Barbara Leff (R-11)Tom O'Halleran (R-1)Jay Tibshraeny (R-21)Thayer Verschoor (R-22)Jim Waring (R-7)Timothy S. Bee (R-30)
No
Paula Aboud (D-28)Meg Burton Cahill (D-17)Ken Cheuvront (D-15)Jorge Luis Garcia (D-27)
Not Voting (Absent)
Amanda Aguirre (D-24)Carolyn S. Allen (R-8)Marsha Arzberger (D-25)Albert Hale (D-2)Leah Landrum Taylor (D-16)Debbie McCune Davis (D-14)Richard Miranda (D-16)Charlene Pesquiera (D-26)Rebecca Rios (D-23)Victor Soltero (D-29)
To see how your Senator voted on this bill originally on Wednesday, click here.
Integrity Lost
Tonight's debate was intense for everyone on the Senate floor and those of us watching in the gallery. But what happened to our openly-gay Senators by their colleagues was absolutely disgusting. Senate extremists strategically broke the rules of the Senate, which govern the processes for discussion and voting on bills. During a filibuster-like discussion on another bill during Committee of the Whole, Majority Leader Thayer Verschoor (R-22) and Majority Whip John Huppenthal (R-20), among others, devised a scheme with committee chairman Jack Harper (R-4) to outright violate the rules of the Senate and the rights of Senators Aboud and Cheuvront.
In the middle of their discussion, Senator Harper turned off the microphones of Senators Paula Aboud (D-28) and Ken Cheuvront (D-15) and called on the Majority Leader to make a motion. Then, when Senators Aboud and Cheuvront loudly called for a Point of Order several times, even walking to the front desk where Senator Harper sat, he deliberately ignored their calls. To add insult to injury, these people attempted to justify their actions, even after the Senate President and other Senators admonished them for deliberately breaking the rules. Tonight's actions of these and other Senators have forever tainted that body, and it's important that we all let the people of Arizona know how these individuals acted so unethically.
Heroes Emerge
In the end, it was Senators Aboud and Cheuvront who gave the most impassioned remarks ever heard on the floor of the Arizona Senate.
Senator Aboud spoke eloquently about the irrational fear Senators were expressing by their yes vote, asking, "Do I scare you?" She talked about family values that matter, like love, caring for elder parents and hospital visitation rights, and reminded her colleagues that these are all rights currently denied to people who cannot marry.
After listening to Sen. Sylvia Allen (R-5) describe what she considered her moral superiority to protect families citing civilization from the 18th century and how same-sex marriage will signal the end of civilization as we know if today, Sen. Cheuvront hit the majority hard when he defined the many ways in which the integrity of the Senate was lost today.
Accurately listing the many ways in which the legislative process was prostituted for political gain, Sen. Cheuvront admonished fellow Republican Senators by exposing the tactics of the Center for Arizona Policy (CAP). This sentiment was echoed by Senate President Bee, who pointed out the extreme measures that CAP used to secure votes, while he was explaining his vote on the bill.
Today's Senate session was the culmination of not just a battle over a bill introduced at the beginning of the session in January but in fact was the end result of CAP's tantrum over the defeat of Prop 107 in 2006. Having lost this session on several other bills, including abstinence-only, abortion, school vouchers and a number of other issues, CAP needed this win to fill their coffers.
No one can deny this bill was nothing more than a referendum on the LGBT community – a political fundraiser to fuel the anti-gay industry in Arizona.
Both Sen. Cheuvront and Representative Steve Gallardo sent messages to those in both chambers, stating those who would vote for this divisive measure may not be very secure in their positions after this session and once voters realize how abusive and out of touch they really are.
Preparing for Tomorrow
No doubt we will see a mix of emotions from anger to sadness, and the worst part is the backlash of violence that often accompanies these actions. As a community we must unite like never before. Our resolve must be unwavering to change the faces of those who cast votes that affect so many lives.
We at Equality Arizona are incredibly proud of those who stood with us throughout this session. Our allies in the Legislature who provided leadership, encouragement and strategic advice were invaluable. We owe a debt of gratitude to Reps. Kyrsten Sinema, Linda Lopez, Robert Meza, Steve Gallardo and others. In the other chamber our heroes are Sens. Paula Aboud, Ken Cheuvront, Debbie McCune-Davis, Jorge Luis Garcia and Meg Burton-Cahill.
In addition to elected officials many individuals and organizations stood by us throughout this process. As Sen. Cheuvront said in his remarks, this kind of experience divides friends and foes very quickly. We are truly humbled at the number of allies from around the state and every walk of life that emerged to assist with strategy. A heartfelt thank you goes to the many supporters that helped build messaging and programs that allowed us to do this work.
We will regain our footing, strengthen our resolve and decide collectively – as a statewide movement for equality - the ways in which we will turn this experience into one which empowers Arizona voters to create a fair and just society.
Despite an amazing process, coercion and corruption won out today in Arizona's Legislature.
But tomorrow is a new day.
Yours in equality,
Barbara McCullough-Jones
Executive Director
and
Sam Holdren
Public Affairs Director
A MESSAGE FROM EQUALITY ARIZONA:
We just got back from the state Capitol, where the Senate voted to force another constitutional amendment to define marriage on the ballot. What happened tonight was disgraceful, but that doesn't change the fact that we will be facing another anti-LGBT amendment this November. It's true. The Arizona Legislature caved to the coercion of a little-known group, the Center for Arizona Policy, led by an extremist fundamentalist -- Cathi Herrod. The Legislature ignored the people of Arizona, who already voted down a similar amendment. The Senate approved Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 1042 tonight, and they broke the rules, along with the sanctity of the Senate, to do so.
How Your Senator Voted
SCR 1042 was brought to the floor of the Senate for reconsideration tonight. It passed with the 16 votes it needed. Below is the list of how your Senator voted.
Find out who your Senator is by clicking here.
Yes
Sylvia Allen (R-5)Robert Blendu (R-12)Robert "Bob" Burns (R-9)Pamela Gorman (R-6)Ron Gould (R-3)Chuck Gray (R-19)Linda Gray (R-10)Jack W. Harper (R-4)John Huppenthal (R-20)Karen Johnson (R-18)Barbara Leff (R-11)Tom O'Halleran (R-1)Jay Tibshraeny (R-21)Thayer Verschoor (R-22)Jim Waring (R-7)Timothy S. Bee (R-30)
No
Paula Aboud (D-28)Meg Burton Cahill (D-17)Ken Cheuvront (D-15)Jorge Luis Garcia (D-27)
Not Voting (Absent)
Amanda Aguirre (D-24)Carolyn S. Allen (R-8)Marsha Arzberger (D-25)Albert Hale (D-2)Leah Landrum Taylor (D-16)Debbie McCune Davis (D-14)Richard Miranda (D-16)Charlene Pesquiera (D-26)Rebecca Rios (D-23)Victor Soltero (D-29)
To see how your Senator voted on this bill originally on Wednesday, click here.
Integrity Lost
Tonight's debate was intense for everyone on the Senate floor and those of us watching in the gallery. But what happened to our openly-gay Senators by their colleagues was absolutely disgusting. Senate extremists strategically broke the rules of the Senate, which govern the processes for discussion and voting on bills. During a filibuster-like discussion on another bill during Committee of the Whole, Majority Leader Thayer Verschoor (R-22) and Majority Whip John Huppenthal (R-20), among others, devised a scheme with committee chairman Jack Harper (R-4) to outright violate the rules of the Senate and the rights of Senators Aboud and Cheuvront.
In the middle of their discussion, Senator Harper turned off the microphones of Senators Paula Aboud (D-28) and Ken Cheuvront (D-15) and called on the Majority Leader to make a motion. Then, when Senators Aboud and Cheuvront loudly called for a Point of Order several times, even walking to the front desk where Senator Harper sat, he deliberately ignored their calls. To add insult to injury, these people attempted to justify their actions, even after the Senate President and other Senators admonished them for deliberately breaking the rules. Tonight's actions of these and other Senators have forever tainted that body, and it's important that we all let the people of Arizona know how these individuals acted so unethically.
Heroes Emerge
In the end, it was Senators Aboud and Cheuvront who gave the most impassioned remarks ever heard on the floor of the Arizona Senate.
Senator Aboud spoke eloquently about the irrational fear Senators were expressing by their yes vote, asking, "Do I scare you?" She talked about family values that matter, like love, caring for elder parents and hospital visitation rights, and reminded her colleagues that these are all rights currently denied to people who cannot marry.
After listening to Sen. Sylvia Allen (R-5) describe what she considered her moral superiority to protect families citing civilization from the 18th century and how same-sex marriage will signal the end of civilization as we know if today, Sen. Cheuvront hit the majority hard when he defined the many ways in which the integrity of the Senate was lost today.
Accurately listing the many ways in which the legislative process was prostituted for political gain, Sen. Cheuvront admonished fellow Republican Senators by exposing the tactics of the Center for Arizona Policy (CAP). This sentiment was echoed by Senate President Bee, who pointed out the extreme measures that CAP used to secure votes, while he was explaining his vote on the bill.
Today's Senate session was the culmination of not just a battle over a bill introduced at the beginning of the session in January but in fact was the end result of CAP's tantrum over the defeat of Prop 107 in 2006. Having lost this session on several other bills, including abstinence-only, abortion, school vouchers and a number of other issues, CAP needed this win to fill their coffers.
No one can deny this bill was nothing more than a referendum on the LGBT community – a political fundraiser to fuel the anti-gay industry in Arizona.
Both Sen. Cheuvront and Representative Steve Gallardo sent messages to those in both chambers, stating those who would vote for this divisive measure may not be very secure in their positions after this session and once voters realize how abusive and out of touch they really are.
Preparing for Tomorrow
No doubt we will see a mix of emotions from anger to sadness, and the worst part is the backlash of violence that often accompanies these actions. As a community we must unite like never before. Our resolve must be unwavering to change the faces of those who cast votes that affect so many lives.
We at Equality Arizona are incredibly proud of those who stood with us throughout this session. Our allies in the Legislature who provided leadership, encouragement and strategic advice were invaluable. We owe a debt of gratitude to Reps. Kyrsten Sinema, Linda Lopez, Robert Meza, Steve Gallardo and others. In the other chamber our heroes are Sens. Paula Aboud, Ken Cheuvront, Debbie McCune-Davis, Jorge Luis Garcia and Meg Burton-Cahill.
In addition to elected officials many individuals and organizations stood by us throughout this process. As Sen. Cheuvront said in his remarks, this kind of experience divides friends and foes very quickly. We are truly humbled at the number of allies from around the state and every walk of life that emerged to assist with strategy. A heartfelt thank you goes to the many supporters that helped build messaging and programs that allowed us to do this work.
We will regain our footing, strengthen our resolve and decide collectively – as a statewide movement for equality - the ways in which we will turn this experience into one which empowers Arizona voters to create a fair and just society.
Despite an amazing process, coercion and corruption won out today in Arizona's Legislature.
But tomorrow is a new day.
Yours in equality,
Barbara McCullough-Jones
Executive Director
and
Sam Holdren
Public Affairs Director
Friday, June 20, 2008
Jason Johnson Scholarship
This year the KFA Foundation will award $1,500 to an outstanding undergraduate or graduate student. Download the application for more information! Applications are due by Aug. 15.
Those interested in learning more about the scholarship or making a tax-deductible donation in support of it can do so by contacting me directly at jodycofer@bellsouth.net.
~Jody
Those interested in learning more about the scholarship or making a tax-deductible donation in support of it can do so by contacting me directly at jodycofer@bellsouth.net.
~Jody
Thursday, June 5, 2008
HRC's Camp Equality in Cincy
KFA has become a partner in HRC’s Camp Equality taking place in Cincinati on July 12 and 13. HRC’s Camp Equality is a program touring the country in strategic areas (Phoenix, Houston, Cincy, Columbus, etc.). It is an interactive training program that combines lectures, discussions, and real-life simulations with a goal to increase the community’s ability to play in the 2008 elections. HRC will be doing some blast e-mails shortly regarding the Cincy camp. KFA will also be releasing an e-mail or two on the matter.
Additional information about Camp Equality as well as registration information can be found online at www.hrc.org/campequality. While the programming is covered by HRC, they require a registration fee of $35 for materials and food.
Are you interested in attending? Watch for an e-mail about this from KFA in the near future.
~Jody
Additional information about Camp Equality as well as registration information can be found online at www.hrc.org/campequality. While the programming is covered by HRC, they require a registration fee of $35 for materials and food.
Are you interested in attending? Watch for an e-mail about this from KFA in the near future.
~Jody
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
The Big Easy: Bad Decision?
I read just now that there is a little bit of debate beginning among the American Political Science Association, one if not "the" professional organization for political sciences folks, over the choice for their 2012 national convention. New Orleans is where it is scheduled to be held. Apparently, the problem is regarding that state’s “defense of marriage” amendment that was adopted in 2004, the same year as Kentucky’s. Some members of the association reportedly are saying that attending could put them and their partners at certain risks such as if an attendee has a health problem and has to go to the hospital while there, his or her partner’s power to make decisions could be denied.
Proponents of the association convening in New Orleans argue that the city needs support as it continues to rebound from Hurricane Katrina. Also, some argue that New Orleans has historically been very tolerant towards the lgbt community; I’d agree, I’ve never heard someone among the lgbt community discuss a bad time in the big easy, but the above mentioned risks made me pause. Christopher Fettweis, faculty member at Tulane University, says he supports gay rights, but given New Orleans historical tolerance feels that this is “A bizarre place to choose to make a stand on the issue”.
There are already talks of boycotting, such as being done by the political-science department at Chapman University.
The association’s governing council will meet in June to discuss this matter. The contract for the conference was negociated in 2003, but did leave a loophole to withdraw if the City of New Orleans "enacts or enforces" laws that violate civil rights, including on the basis of sexual orientation (according to the Chronicle of Higher Education). The association is seeking input from its members on this matter. If you have feelings on this, you should contact a political-science faculty member at one of your nearest University. They (the member) can comment online at www.apsanet.org. If you don’t know anyone in a position like that, post feedback on here and I’ll share with someone I know.
So, what do you think? Good reason to take a stand? Could this hit Kentucky one day? Could some national association wish to gather in the Bluegrass State and it fall apart because of our “Anti-Marriage Amendment”?
~Jody
Proponents of the association convening in New Orleans argue that the city needs support as it continues to rebound from Hurricane Katrina. Also, some argue that New Orleans has historically been very tolerant towards the lgbt community; I’d agree, I’ve never heard someone among the lgbt community discuss a bad time in the big easy, but the above mentioned risks made me pause. Christopher Fettweis, faculty member at Tulane University, says he supports gay rights, but given New Orleans historical tolerance feels that this is “A bizarre place to choose to make a stand on the issue”.
There are already talks of boycotting, such as being done by the political-science department at Chapman University.
The association’s governing council will meet in June to discuss this matter. The contract for the conference was negociated in 2003, but did leave a loophole to withdraw if the City of New Orleans "enacts or enforces" laws that violate civil rights, including on the basis of sexual orientation (according to the Chronicle of Higher Education). The association is seeking input from its members on this matter. If you have feelings on this, you should contact a political-science faculty member at one of your nearest University. They (the member) can comment online at www.apsanet.org. If you don’t know anyone in a position like that, post feedback on here and I’ll share with someone I know.
So, what do you think? Good reason to take a stand? Could this hit Kentucky one day? Could some national association wish to gather in the Bluegrass State and it fall apart because of our “Anti-Marriage Amendment”?
~Jody
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
